Back in 1995, I was attending a church in Aurora, Colorado. I remember the day the church announced that they would be starting a prophecy class. At first, I thought it would be a general class about prophecy. But I was surprised to learn that the class was focused on Daniel’s 70-week prophecy.
The books for the class were purchased, and I began attending.
Long story short, by the end of that class, I believed I had not been given the truth. In fact, I believed I had been given a concept.
Why?
Because the math was not mathen.
The class focused primarily on 70 of the 490 years, while leaving 420 years ignored. I believed something was missing. I decided that I would never attend church again until I understood the truth about the entire 490 years of
Daniel’s prophecy.
So, for the next 28 years, I studied prophecy on my own.
Then one day, I found myself going through the Bible, and for the first time in 28 years, I paused during the time of Noah and reflected on the fact that the Bible shifted to moon cycles.
At that time, I had two books sitting on my bookshelf that had been there for about a year:
The Book of Enoch and The Book of Jubilees.
I thought to myself, one of these books must have something I can work with. So I picked up The Book of Enoch.
And as you might expect, I was floored by the chapters related to the luminaries. But I did not find anything that helped me chronologically or genealogically.
So, I opened The Book of Jubilees.
Long story short, I could hardly contain myself with what I was reading. The Book of Jubilees led me to The Book of Jasher and The Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs. These books took me to a whole new level of understanding as it related to genealogy and chronology.
What ended up happening is that I realized there were two methods being used to calculate the Jubilee cycles.
I did not know it at the time, but the version of The Book of Jubilees that I was reading had been calculated using the 49-year method. I know this because after reading the entire Book of Jubilees, I wanted to know how the Jubilee years were adopted.
So I went online and learned both methods: the 49-year method and the 50-year method. The 50-year method appeared to be less complicated, so I chose to recalculate The Book of Jubilees using the more complicated 49-year method first.I began performing the calculations during my second run through The Book of Jubilees. I was getting the same numbers as the pre-calculated years within that version of the book, so I kept going.
But when I reached the 49th Jubilee, I began to feel that something was off.I didn't know what it was. I could not put my finger on it. But something was not right. I finished the Book of Jubilees with the Exodus at 2410 AM, the exact number that was in my version of The Book of Jubilees.But I was not happy with that number.
It did not look right.
It did not feel right.
And it did not seem right.
So I abandoned the 49-year method and adopted the 50-year method, hoping for different results. After applying the 50-year method, I quickly realized that I was getting different year numbers. That was good. I also began measuring the distance in time between events for accuracy between the two methodologies.
All was good until I found myself at the Exodus at 2509 AM.
Immediately, I knew that this could not be right.
I do not know how I knew it. I guess you could say my internal reasoning was sounding the alarm, just as it had after attending the prophecy class 28 years earlier.
At that point, I decided to perform a side-by-side comparative analysis between both methods using the year of the Exodus.
What I found was a 99-year disparity.
The 49-year method placed the Exodus at 2410 AM.
The 50-year method placed the same Exodus at 2509 AM.
That was a difference of 99 years, and I didn't think it was a coincidence that 49 + 50 = 99.
For three days, I pondered why this was so.
Then, on the morning of the third day, I woke up from a dream. But it was not until that evening that I remembered the last thing that was said to me in that dream:
“If the 49-year cycle and the 50th year can both exist in the same timeline, why wouldn’t they both exist on the same mathematical formula, So I put both methods together.
And there it was.The 3rd Method appeared.
It came with a different set of numbered years than the commonly used 49-year method, and also the 50-year method. Because I discovered it, I call it The Smith Jubilee Formula. It was a year later that I discovered what I call the Divine Chrono Matrix, or DCM.
They are two parts of one system. They check each other and keep the math consistent. The SJF takes in the number of the Jubilee, the number of weeks, and the number of loose years, and it locates the corresponding AM year. The DCM takes any AM year and finds its Jubilee cycle, number of weeks, and loose years.
This is how they check one another.
Together, they preserve consistency with an unbreakable numerical count. That is how the Smith Jubilee Formula and Divine Chrono Matrix became the foundation of the BANG Jubilee Calculator 5.0. And that is why I created the video titled “Daniel’s 70 Weeks.”
That video shows how the BANG Jubilee Calculator measures Daniel’s prophecy from inside the biblical framework, without depending on BC or BCE dating systems, archaeological ranges, or carbon dating.That video explains how the BANG Jubilee Calculator measures Daniel’s prophecy from within the biblical framework itself.
So before we move deeper into The Judah ID Part Three, I recommend watching that video, because Daniel’s 70 Weeks is where the measuring foundation becomes visible.
Once that foundation is understood, the next question becomes unavoidable: If Daniel’s timeline can be measured, can the Diaspora Corridor also be measured?
