Back in 1995, I was attending a church in Aurora, Colorado. I remember the day the church announced that they would be starting a prophecy class. At first, I thought it would be a general class about prophecy. But I was surprised to learn that the class was focused on Daniel’s 70-week prophecy.
The books for the class were purchased, and I began attending.
Long story short, by the end of that class, I believed I had not been given the truth. In fact, I believed I had been given a concept.
Why?
Because the math was not mathen.
The class focused primarily on 70 of the 490 years, while leaving 420 years ignored. I believed something was missing. I decided that I would never attend church again until I understood the truth about the entire 490 years of
Daniel’s prophecy.
So, for the next 28 years, I studied prophecy on my own.
Then one day, I found myself going through the Bible, and for the first time in 28 years, I paused during the time of Noah and reflected on the fact that the Bible shifted to moon cycles.
At that time, I had two books sitting on my bookshelf that had been there for about a year:
The Book of Enoch and The Book of Jubilees.
I thought to myself, one of these books must have something I can work with. So I picked up The Book of Enoch.
And as you might expect, I was floored by the chapters related to the luminaries. But I did not find anything that helped me chronologically or genealogically.
So, I opened The Book of Jubilees.
Long story short, I could hardly contain myself with what I was reading. The Book of Jubilees led me to The Book of Jasher and The Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs. These books took me to a whole new level of understanding as it related to genealogy and chronology.
What ended up happening is that I realized there were two methods being used to calculate the Jubilee cycles.
I did not know it at the time, but the version of The Book of Jubilees that I was reading had been calculated using the 49-year method. I know this because after reading the entire Book of Jubilees, I wanted to know how the Jubilee years were adopted.
So I went online and learned both methods: the 49-year method and the 50-year method. The 50-year method appeared to be less complicated, so I chose to recalculate The Book of Jubilees using the more complicated 49-year method first.I began performing the calculations during my second run through The Book of Jubilees. I was getting the same numbers as the pre-calculated years within that version of the book, so I kept going.
But when I reached the 49th Jubilee, I began to feel that something was off.I didn't know what it was. I could not put my finger on it. But something was not right. I finished the Book of Jubilees with the Exodus at 2410 AM, the exact number that was in my version of The Book of Jubilees.But I was not happy with that number.
It did not look right.
It did not feel right.
And it did not seem right.
So I abandoned the 49-year method and adopted the 50-year method, hoping for different results. After applying the 50-year method, I quickly realized that I was getting different year numbers. That was good. I also began measuring the distance in time between events for accuracy between the two methodologies.
All was good until I found myself at the Exodus at 2509 AM.
Immediately, I knew that this could not be right.
I do not know how I knew it. I guess you could say my internal reasoning was sounding the alarm, just as it had after attending the prophecy class 28 years earlier.
At that point, I decided to perform a side-by-side comparative analysis between both methods using the year of the Exodus.
What I found was a 99-year disparity.
The 49-year method placed the Exodus at 2410 AM.
The 50-year method placed the same Exodus at 2509 AM.
That was a difference of 99 years, and I didn't think it was a coincidence that 49 + 50 = 99.
For three days, I pondered why this was so.
Then, on the morning of the third day, I woke up from a dream. But it was not until that evening that I remembered the last thing that was said to me in that dream:
“If the 49-year cycle and the 50th year can both exist in the same timeline, why wouldn’t they both exist on the same mathematical formula, So I put both methods together.
And there it was.The 3rd Method appeared.
It came with a different set of numbered years than the commonly used 49-year method, and also the 50-year method. Because I discovered it, I call it The Smith Jubilee Formula. It was a year later that I discovered what I call the Divine Chrono Matrix, or DCM.
They are two parts of one system. They check each other and keep the math consistent. The SJF takes in the number of the Jubilee, the number of weeks, and the number of loose years, and it locates the corresponding AM year. The DCM takes any AM year and finds its Jubilee cycle, number of weeks, and loose years.
This is how they check one another.
Together, they preserve consistency with an unbreakable numerical count. That is how the Smith Jubilee Formula and Divine Chrono Matrix became the foundation of the BANG Jubilee Calculator 5.0. And that is why I created the video titled “Daniel’s 70 Weeks.”
That video shows how the BANG Jubilee Calculator measures Daniel’s prophecy from inside the biblical framework, without depending on BC or BCE dating systems, archaeological ranges, or carbon dating.That video explains how the BANG Jubilee Calculator measures Daniel’s prophecy from within the biblical framework itself.
So before we move deeper into The Judah ID Part Three, I recommend watching that video, because Daniel’s 70 Weeks is where the measuring foundation becomes visible.
Once that foundation is understood, the next question becomes unavoidable: If Daniel’s timeline can be measured, can the Diaspora Corridor also be measured?

This panel introduces what I call the Diaspora Corridor.
It begins with the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD.
When Jerusalem fell, the people did not simply vanish from history. They fled, they scattered, and they moved through identifiable regions. What this panel presents is a conceptual migration corridor showing how that movement could be traced from Jerusalem into Egypt, and from there into North Africa.
The first stage is the most immediate:
After Jerusalem fell, the direction of escape was important.
They could not easily go north, because that meant moving toward Roman military pressure.
They couldn’t simply go west, because the sea stood in the way.
And moving east would have meant entering difficult terrain hills, caves, mountains, and vulnerable routes where capture would have been inevitable.
So when we look at this map, Egypt is not random.
Egypt becomes the logical southern corridor.
And from Egypt, the path into North Africa becomes the first major route in the Diaspora Corridor.
flight from Jerusalem into Egypt.
This is important because once Jerusalem fell, the scattering of the people was no longer just a warning found in prophecy. It became a historical reality.
From Egypt, the corridor moves into Alexandria, then westward into Cyrene, Carthage, and across the North African corridor through Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco.
This is what I identify as Stage Two and Stage Three of the corridor.
Stage Two marks a growing presence in North Africa.
Stage Three shows a broader westward corridor across North Africa, revealing that the people were not stationary. They were moving, surviving, and leaving footprints across regions that history often treats separately.
This matters because the Judah ID is not only about who Israel was in the land. It is also about where Israel went after the judgments of the covenant began to unfold.
And this is where the investigation becomes necessary.
The world appears content to leave the lost tribes of Israel simply that: lost.
But the biblical record does not allow us to stop there.
According to Hosea 4:6, the people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.
According to Deuteronomy 30, they would call these things to mind among the nations where they had been driven.
That means the scattering is not the end of the story.
The scattering is part of the evidence.
This panel also allows for a possible later movement toward Iberia and Portugal.
That detail matters because it shows that the corridor may not have ended in North Africa. It may have extended outward into additional regions, creating further paths of investigation.
So this panel is not claiming that every detail has already been solved.
What it does claim is that the movement is traceable, the corridor is investigable, and the scattered condition of the people can be examined through both prophecy and history.
This is why I call it the Diaspora Corridor.
It is a corridor of displacement.
It is a corridor of memory.
And it is a corridor that must be tested.
In the larger Judah ID investigation, this movement out of Jerusalem and into North Africa becomes one of the earliest major pathways for tracing the scattered descendants of Israel.
Egypt was not just a place on the map; it was the open corridor when other directions were blocked by Rome, sea, or terrain.
As we move forward, we must keep a few things in mind:
If the people were scattered, then their footprints should exist.
If their footprints exist, then the corridor can be investigated.
And if the corridor can be investigated, then the lost should not remain lost and innovation are accessible to all and have the power to transform society. We are committed to advancing the frontiers of knowledge and driving progress through groundbreaking research and discovery.
%20The%20Diaspora%20Corridor.png/:/cr=t:0%25,l:0%25,w:100%25,h:100%25/rs=w:600,cg:true)
This panel introduces the Diaspora Corridor, tracing a possible survival route from Jerusalem’s fall into Egypt and across North Africa. It frames the scattering of Israel as an investigable movement through geography, prophecy, and history rather than a disconnected or permanently lost migration.

This panel identifies Dum Diversas as a timed marker in the Diaspora investigation. The decree is presented as a legal and theological doorway that helped authorize conquest, subjugation, and enslavement, raising the question of whether scattered Israel in Africa became a target within this larger system.

This panel measures the span from Dum Diversas in 1452 AD / 4874 AM to Galveston in 1865 AD / 5287 AM. The 413-year distance is presented as a historical witness connecting legal bondage, forced migration, delayed freedom, and sacred-time measurement.

This panel marks Galveston as a measured emancipation witness. Freedom had already been declared, but it reached the enslaved in Texas later, showing that liberty was delayed, controlled, and unevenly delivered. In the Judah ID framework, Galveston becomes a major AM timeline marker.

This panel marks 1877 AD / 5299 AM as the end of Reconstruction and the withdrawal of federal protection. The descendants had only a brief window after emancipation before new systems of oppression emerged, making this a transition marker from protection to renewed struggle.

This panel presents Benjamin “Pap” Singleton as a response to Reconstruction’s collapse. When protection failed to secure freedom, Singleton pursued land, liberty, and self-determination. His movement toward Kansas becomes a symbol of separation, rebuilding, and the Exodus after Emancipation.

This panel identifies 5300 AM / 1879 AD as the 106th Jubilee, standing at the threshold of Jim Crow. A Jubilee should proclaim liberty, yet the descendants faced segregation, violence, disenfranchisement, and control, revealing a contrast between sacred structure and historical condition.

This panel measures 100 years from Galveston in 5287 AM / 1865 AD to the Civil Rights era in 5387 AM / 1965 AD. The century-long span shows that freedom was announced, but equality, protection, and justice remained unresolved.

This panel marks 1965 AD / 5387 AM as both a national civil-rights milestone and my personal birth marker. It connects the Voting Rights era to measured distances from Jacob’s birth and Joseph’s death, showing public history and personal witness converging in one year.

This panel follows the continuing cry for justice after Civil Rights, moving through 1963, 1992, 1995, and the 2020s. It presents modern protest, police-brutality grievances, and public demands for justice as evidence that the deeper condition did not end in 1965.

This panel traces the changing forms of captivity from emancipation to the modern era. It moves through Black Codes, Jim Crow, redlining, mass incarceration, police violence, and white supremacist ideology, arguing that the system changed form while the pressure on the descendants continued.

This panel identifies 5400 AM / 1979 AD as the 108th Jubilee, a modern marker showing that the Jubilee count continued beyond the Exodus, Solomon, the Messiah, Jerusalem’s fall, Galveston, and Civil Rights. It points forward toward the approaching 109th Jubilee.

This panel places 2025 AD / 5447 AM near a major prophetic remembrance window, measured from the Messiah’s first ministry year. It connects the present generation to the kingdom message, renewed investigation, Jubilee awareness, and the question of where Israel stands in sacred time.

This panel presents the 109th Jubilee as a revival witness after two prophetic days. From the Messiah’s Jubilee marker at 3450 AM to 5450 AM is 2,000 years, 40 Jubilees, and two prophetic days, connecting Hosea 6:2 to remembrance, return, and restoration.


This panel identifies the 109th Jubilee as a major revival marker. From 3450 AM to 5450 AM is 2,000 years, 40 Jubilees, and two prophetic days, connecting Hosea 6:2 and 2 Peter 3:8 to Israel’s remembrance, return, investigation, and restoration.

Our vision at theblackancestrynetworkgroup.com is to be a leading research foundation that is dedicated to solving complex problems that affect our world. We strive to be recognized for our commitment to excellence in research and for the positive impact of our work on society.

Why is the world content on leaving the lost tribes of Israel simply that, lost?
Let's cut them off from being a nation.

Dont believe it. Test it for your self, and trust yourself not to lie to yourself.

I am not smart enough to create a perfect timeline such as this.

BC & BCE era dating systems of time management, archaeological time frames, and carbon dating ranges have nothing on the Bible.
